ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided mammotomy versus conventional surgery in the treatment of benign breast tumors. Methods:Sixty patients with benign breast tumors who received treatment in Jiamusi Central Hospital from September 2018 to September 2019 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo either conventional surgery (control group, n = 30) or ultrasound-guided mammotomy (treatment group, n = 30). Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, incision length, and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results:Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and incision length in the treatment group were (4.25 ± 1.23) mL, (15.36 ± 3.21) minutes, (0.41 ± 0.05) cm, respectively, which were significantly lower or shorter than those in the control group [(10.75 ± 2.12) mL, (29.68 ± 7.23) minutes, (2.9 ± 0.8) cm, t = 14.526, 9.915, 17.015, all P < 0.05]. In the treatment group, the incidence of complications was 3.33% (local hematoma n = 1, skin depression n = 0, flap necrosis n = 0, postoperative bleeding n = 0), which was significantly lower that 23.00% in the control group (local hematoma n = 2, skin depression n = 1, flap necrosis n = 1, postoperative bleeding n = 3, χ2 = 5.192, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Compared with the traditional treatment, ultrasound-guided minimally invasive mastectomy is more effective in the treatment of benign breast tumors.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of minimally invasive rotary resection versus open surgery in the treatment of benign breast tumor. Methods:The clinical data of 112 patients with benign breast tumor who received treatment in Jiamusi Central Hospital, China between April 2018 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into minimally invasive rotary resection group ( n = 56) and open surgery group ( n = 56) according to different surgical methods. The minimally invasive rotary resection group was treated with an Anke minimally invasive system, and the open surgery group was treated with open surgery. Operation time, pain score, incision length, incidence of complications, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results:Operation time, pain score and incision length were (15.39 ± 3.21) minutes, (2.36 ± 0.52) points, (3.0 ± 0.11) mm, respectively, in the minimally invasive rotary resection group and they were (32.55 ± 4.56) minutes, (4.45 ± 1.48) points and (22.65 ± 8.23) mm, respectively in the open surgery group. There were significant differences in these indices between the two groups ( t = 23.027, 9.970, 17.865, all P < 0.05). The incidence of compilations in the minimally invasive rotary resection group was significantly lower than that in the open surgery group [1.78% (1/56) vs. 14.28% (8/56) , χ2 = 5.920, P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction in the minimally invasive rotary resection group was significantly higher than that in the open surgery group [96.42% (54/56) vs. 80.35% (45/56), χ2 = 7.049, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Minimally invasive rotary resection surgery for the treatment of benign breast tumor has an obvious therapeutic effect, a low incidence of complications and high patient satisfaction.